Afghanistan Human Rights Center
Text size
Sign in
Dignity, Freedom, and Justice for All Monitoring, defending, and advancing human rights in Afghanistan
Donate

Methodology & legal basis

How an entry gets into the record — what we collect, how it is coded and graded, who reviews it — and the domestic and international law each category rests on.

How grades work

A verified-or-not badge cannot separate an event three outlets witnessed from one a channel mentioned. Every entry carries a grade, and the grade is part of the citation.

Confirmed Reviewed and accepted. Two or more independent sources agree on the core facts.
Corroborated Two or more sources report it, but detail differs or review is still open.
Single-source One report only. Published so the claim is on the record, not as an established fact.

Only entries a researcher has reviewed and accepted appear on this site. The levels above describe how we grade what we hold, not how much of it is public.

A grade can change. If further sourcing arrives, an entry moves up; if sourcing collapses on review, it is set aside and kept, so the exclusion stays auditable. Quote your retrieval date when you cite.

Standard of proof & how we count

AHRC applies the standard used by UN human-rights fact-finding: an entry is marked Verified when there are reasonable grounds to believe the incident occurred as described — a reasonable and ordinarily prudent person would be justified in the belief on the information gathered. It is a documentation standard, deliberately below criminal-proof thresholds, and every entry keeps its grade visible so readers can see how much sourcing sits behind it.

Most entries begin from a single published source. A single-source entry is labelled as such and stays “under review” until corroborated or confirmed by a reviewer; syndicated copies of the same report do not count as independent corroboration.

Counting is conservative. Figures are minimums — “at least” — never estimates; we do not extrapolate. A weekly or monthly figure counts entries whose incident date falls within that calendar window (inclusive), computed from the record as of the stated retrieval date; because review is continuous, a figure can change after publication, and when it does the change is acknowledged in the corrections log.

Violation taxonomy

Each code names the treaty provision the conduct engages, so an assignment can be checked rather than trusted.

HR-ASSY-01

Suppression of peaceful protest

Violent dispersal, arrest, or banning of peaceful demonstrations.

HR-CHILD-01

Recruitment / use of children

Recruitment or use of children by armed forces or armed groups.

HR-CHILD-02

Violence against children

Killing, maiming, or abuse of children.

HR-DET-01

Arbitrary arrest / detention

Detention without legal basis, warrant, or due process.

HR-DET-02

Enforced disappearance

Detention followed by refusal to acknowledge fate or whereabouts of the person.

HR-DET-03

Hostage-taking / abduction

Abduction or hostage-taking by armed actors.

HR-DISP-01

Forced displacement / eviction

Forced eviction, home demolition, or displacement of communities.

HR-DISP-02

Collective expulsion / forced return

Mass expulsion or refoulement of refugees / returnees.

HR-ESC-01

Denial of humanitarian access / food

Blocking aid, or deprivation of food, water, or health care to a population.

HR-EXPR-01

Suppression of press / journalists

Detention, assault, censorship, or intimidation of journalists and media.

HR-EXPR-02

Censorship / restriction of speech

Banning of media, internet/communication shutdowns, or speech restrictions.

HR-JUST-01

Denial of fair trial / due process

Conviction or punishment without a fair, public hearing by a competent tribunal.

HR-LIFE-01

Extrajudicial / summary killing

Unlawful killing by state or de-facto authorities outside any judicial process.

HR-LIFE-02

Killing of civilians in attack

Civilian deaths from bombings, raids, or armed attacks, including IED and airstrikes.

HR-LIFE-03

Targeted assassination

Deliberate killing of a specific individual (journalist, activist, official, cleric).

HR-MIN-01

Ethnic / minority persecution

Targeting of an ethnic or minority community (e.g. Hazara, Shia) for attack or discrimination.

HR-OTHER-01

Other credible human-rights violation

A credible human-rights violation that does not fit the categories above.

HR-REL-01

Religious persecution

Persecution, attacks, or restrictions targeting a religious or belief group.

HR-SGBV-01

Sexual violence / rape

Rape, sexual assault, or sexual exploitation, including in detention.

HR-SGBV-02

Forced / child marriage

Coerced marriage, including marriage of minors.

HR-TORT-01

Torture

Infliction of severe pain or suffering to punish, intimidate, or extract information.

HR-TORT-02

Cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment

Ill-treatment falling short of torture, including beatings and degrading conditions.

HR-TORT-03

Corporal / inhuman punishment

Public lashing, amputation, stoning, or other corporal punishment.

HR-WMN-01

Denial of women's right to work

Bans or restrictions on women's employment and public-sector participation.

HR-WMN-02

Denial of girls' education

Banning or barring girls and women from secondary, higher, or any education.

HR-WMN-03

Restriction of freedom of movement (women)

Mahram requirements, travel bans, and dress-code enforcement against women.

HR-WMN-04

Gender-based persecution

Systematic persecution or punishment of a person on the basis of gender.

From collection to publication

Collection and classification are automated. Every entry shows its state openly: it is marked “under review — not yet verified by AHRC” until a human reviewer confirms it and its sourcing, and only then is it marked “Verified by AHRC.”

The automated steps use large language models (Anthropic Claude) for relevance screening and first-pass classification, with harder cases escalated to a stronger model. Every entry records which model classified it and under which prompt version, model confidence is shown rather than hidden, a fixed evaluation set and outside-the-loop audit samples watch for drift, and no entry becomes “Verified by AHRC” without a named human reviewer confirming it.

Collected
Monitored sources in three languages, seven days a week.
Screened
Anything with no human-rights dimension is dropped and not stored as an entry.
Coded
Structured extraction against the UN taxonomy, with the treaty article named.
Sent to review
Every entry shows its state: “under review — not yet verified” until a researcher confirms it and its sources, then “Verified by AHRC.”
Published
Accepted by a named researcher, with the grade the sourcing supports.

What we withhold

Names are withheld. Exact locations are withheld. Contributor identities are never stored alongside an entry. Where a source cannot be published, the row still appears, marked not public, so the count of sources behind an entry is never inflated or hidden.

Protection policy →

What this record cannot tell you

The record is what reached us and passed review. Thin coverage in a province reflects reporting conditions and access as much as the underlying situation. Absence of entries is not evidence of absence of violations, and no figure on this site should be read as a national total.

Corrections

When a published figure or entry changes materially — a re-grade, a merged duplicate, a revised count — the change is acknowledged in a public corrections log rather than silently overwritten. Honesty about revisions is part of the record.

View the corrections log →